N※N

Politics and Government
Source : (remove) : Football365
^{RSS • JSON • XML • CSV}

Politics and Government
Source : (remove) : Football365
^{RSS • JSON • XML • CSV}

Why Muhammad Yunus' Bangladesh govt is investigating Sheikh Hasina-era elections of 2014, 2018 and 2024 | Explained

Why Muhammad Yunus' Bangladesh Government is Investigating Sheikh Hasina-Era Elections of 2014, 2018, and 2024: Explained

In a dramatic turn of events following the ousting of long-time Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina in August 2024, Bangladesh's interim government, led by Nobel laureate Muhammad Yunus, has launched a comprehensive investigation into the national elections held under her administration in 2014, 2018, and 2024. This probe, announced amid widespread calls for accountability and democratic reform, aims to uncover alleged irregularities, voter suppression, and manipulation that critics say undermined the country's democratic processes. As Bangladesh navigates a fragile transition period marked by student-led protests and political upheaval, this investigation represents a pivotal step toward restoring public trust in electoral institutions. But why these specific elections? What allegations surround them? And what could the outcomes mean for Bangladesh's future? This article delves into the details, providing a thorough explanation of the context, controversies, and implications.

To understand the significance of this investigation, it's essential to revisit the political landscape under Sheikh Hasina's rule. Hasina, daughter of Bangladesh's founding father Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, led the Awami League to power in 2009 and maintained a firm grip on the government for over 15 years. Her tenure was characterized by rapid economic growth, infrastructure development, and poverty reduction, but it was also marred by accusations of authoritarianism, human rights abuses, and the erosion of democratic norms. Opposition parties, particularly the Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) led by Khaleda Zia, frequently boycotted elections, claiming they were rigged in favor of the ruling party. International observers, including the United Nations and human rights groups like Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch, repeatedly raised concerns about the fairness of these polls, citing violence, intimidation, and restrictions on free speech.

The decision to investigate stems directly from the mass uprising that forced Hasina's resignation and flight to India on August 5, 2024. What began as student protests against a controversial job quota system escalated into a nationwide movement demanding an end to what many perceived as a one-party rule. Muhammad Yunus, the microfinance pioneer and founder of Grameen Bank, was appointed as the chief adviser to the interim government, tasked with overseeing reforms and preparing for fresh elections. Yunus, who has long been a critic of Hasina—having faced legal harassment under her regime—has emphasized transparency and justice as cornerstones of his administration. In a recent statement, he described the probe as necessary to "heal the wounds of the past and build a truly democratic Bangladesh." The investigation is being spearheaded by a special commission, which includes legal experts, former election officials, and civil society representatives, with a mandate to examine electoral rolls, voting procedures, and allegations of fraud.

Let's break down the elections in question, starting with the 2014 general election. Held on January 5, 2014, this poll was one of the most contentious in Bangladesh's history. The opposition BNP, along with its allies, boycotted the election entirely, protesting the government's refusal to install a neutral caretaker administration to oversee the process—a system that had been in place for previous elections but was abolished by Hasina's government in 2011 through a constitutional amendment. Without major opposition participation, the Awami League secured a landslide victory, winning 234 out of 300 seats in parliament. However, the election was overshadowed by widespread violence, including arson attacks, bombings, and clashes that resulted in dozens of deaths. Voter turnout was dismally low, estimated at around 40%, with many polling stations deserted due to fear and boycott calls. Critics alleged that the government used state machinery to suppress dissent, including the arrest of opposition leaders and the deployment of security forces to intimidate voters. International bodies, such as the European Union and the United States, declined to send full observer missions, citing concerns over credibility. The Yunus-led government is now scrutinizing claims of "fake voting," where ballots were allegedly cast on behalf of absent voters, and the role of the Election Commission, which was accused of bias toward the ruling party.

Moving to the 2018 election, conducted on December 30, 2018, the controversies intensified. Once again, the opposition, united under the banner of the Jatiya Oikya Front (National Unity Front), faced severe crackdowns. Thousands of opposition activists were arrested in the lead-up to the polls, and reports emerged of enforced disappearances and extrajudicial killings. The BNP claimed that its leader, Khaleda Zia, was unjustly imprisoned on corruption charges to sideline her from the race. Despite these hurdles, the opposition participated but alleged massive rigging. The Awami League won 288 seats, an even more dominant majority than in 2014. Voter turnout was reported at 80%, but independent observers questioned this figure, pointing to instances of ballot stuffing and coercion. A particularly damning report from the Asian Network for Free Elections (ANFREL) highlighted "systematic irregularities," including the use of fake voter IDs and pressure on polling agents. Social media played a role too, with allegations that the government throttled internet access to curb opposition campaigning. The international community expressed alarm; the U.S. State Department noted "credible reports of harassment, intimidation, and violence," while the EU called for investigations into the violence that claimed at least 17 lives on election day. The current probe is expected to delve into digital evidence, such as manipulated voter databases, and testimonies from affected parties, potentially leading to legal action against former officials.

The most recent election under scrutiny is the 2024 poll, held on January 7, 2024, just months before Hasina's downfall. This election was perhaps the most criticized, occurring against a backdrop of economic distress, including high inflation and unemployment, which fueled public discontent. The BNP again boycotted, labeling it a "sham" and organizing nationwide strikes and blockades in protest. With no major opposition, the Awami League clinched 222 seats, supplemented by independents aligned with the party. Voter turnout was officially 41.8%, but skeptics argued it was inflated. Reports of pre-election violence were rampant, with over 100 opposition members reportedly killed in the preceding year. Human Rights Watch documented cases of arbitrary arrests and torture, while the government's control over media outlets stifled critical coverage. Notably, this election drew sharper international condemnation; the United States imposed visa restrictions on Bangladeshi officials involved in undermining democracy, and the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights urged an independent probe into election-related abuses. The Yunus administration views this election as the culmination of Hasina's alleged authoritarian drift, and the investigation will likely focus on the role of "dummy candidates"—individuals fielded to create an illusion of competition—and the misuse of state resources for campaigning.

The implications of this investigation are profound. If evidence of widespread fraud is substantiated, it could lead to the annulment of these elections' results, though retroactively invalidating them poses legal challenges. More immediately, it could result in prosecutions of former ministers, election commissioners, and security personnel under charges of corruption, electoral malpractice, and human rights violations. Politically, it bolsters the interim government's legitimacy by addressing the protesters' demands for justice, potentially paving the way for constitutional reforms, such as reinstating the caretaker government system. However, challenges abound: the probe must navigate a polarized society, where Hasina's supporters decry it as a witch hunt, while opposition figures push for swift action. There's also the risk of instability if findings exacerbate divisions.

Economically, Bangladesh, a garment-exporting powerhouse, relies on stable governance to maintain investor confidence. Yunus has assured that the investigation will be fair and evidence-based, drawing on forensic audits and witness protections to ensure credibility. International support is crucial; organizations like the International Republican Institute and the Carter Center have offered technical assistance for electoral reforms. As Bangladesh stands at a crossroads, this probe is not just about reckoning with the past but about forging a more inclusive future. By confronting these electoral ghosts, the nation hopes to emerge stronger, with institutions that truly reflect the will of its people. The coming months will reveal whether this effort succeeds in healing old wounds or opens new ones, but one thing is clear: the era of unquestioned dominance is over, and accountability is the new watchword in Dhaka. (Word count: 1,248)

Read the Full moneycontrol.com Article at:
[ https://www.moneycontrol.com/world/why-muhammad-yunus-bangladesh-govt-is-investigating-sheikh-hasina-era-elections-of-2014-2018-and-2024-explained-article-13351463.html ]