N※N

President-elect Misstates "Carbon Negativity" at Climate Summit

30

  //politics-government.news-articles.net/content/ .. sstates-carbon-negativity-at-climate-summit.html
  Published in Politics and Government on Friday, November 28th 2025 at 17:29 GMT by Fox News

• 🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication
• 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source

2025-11-28 199 x 224 / 5043 Bytes

2025-11-28 179 x 224 / 11312 Bytes

2025-11-28 196 x 224 / 5236 Bytes

2025-11-28 248 x 203 / 8892 Bytes

Political Turkeys of 2025: A Year‑Long Roster of Blunders That Won’t Be Forgiven

The first half of 2025 has proved to be a record‑setting calendar of political faux pas, from gaffes that tripped headlines to policy mishaps that have drawn bipartisan criticism. In an article that has quickly become a go‑to reference for political pundits and casual readers alike, MSN’s “Political Turkeys of 2025” pulls the rug from under 15 of the most high‑profile U.S. politicians, offering a concise but punchy look at the missteps that, according to the writer, “will never be pardoned by the public.” Below is a full‑length summary of that piece, broken down by the individual blunders, their context, and the public response.

1. President‑in‑the‑Making Misquotes the Climate Summit

The article opens with a clip from the President‑elect’s opening speech at the 2025 Climate Action Summit in New York, where he mistakenly described “carbon neutrality” as “carbon negativity.” A viral video of the slip, which was promptly corrected in the press briefing that followed, became an overnight meme. The piece links to a FactCheck.org analysis that explains the distinction between the two terms and notes that the president’s own Climate Team later issued a statement emphasizing the need for clarity.

2. Senator Sarah L. McDonald’s “The End Is Near” Remark

A single tweet from Senator McDonald, a rising star in the Senate, stated, “The end is near for our planet if we don’t act now.” The writer argues that the tweet’s hyperbole, combined with the senator’s history of skeptical comments on the Paris Agreement, was a “blunder that hurt her credibility.” The article cites a Washington Post piece that tracked the senator’s voting record on climate legislation and notes that her comment was flagged by several environmental watchdogs.

3. Rep. Thomas J. Raines and the “Racist” Budget Cut

A congressional budget proposal put forward by Rep. Raines included a drastic cut to funding for the Department of Education’s Title I programs, which serve low‑income students. The article argues that the proposal’s language was “discriminatory and mischaracterized the needs of historically underserved communities.” Raines’ office issued a press release, linked within the piece, claiming that the cuts were a “temporary measure to reduce waste.” The piece then references a study from the Brookings Institution that counters that claim, illustrating how the cuts would widen the achievement gap.

4. Governor Linda P. Ortiz’s Mis‑used Pandemic Data

The article recounts how Governor Ortiz, during a statewide address, claimed that the COVID‑19 case count had “plummeted by 90 percent.” In reality, state data from the Department of Health indicated a 25‑percent drop. The Governor’s office released a correction, but the piece links to a New York Times investigative article that highlights the governor’s pattern of overstating public health successes, citing a CDC report that contradicted her claims.

5. Mayor Alex H. Chen’s “We’ve Got It Under Control” Statement on Homelessness

When asked about the rising number of unsheltered homeless residents in the city, Mayor Chen replied, “We’ve got it under control.” The article points out that the city’s own homeless services division reported a 15% increase in unsheltered individuals that year. The mayor’s comment was quickly followed by a call from the City Council, linking to a city council minutes document that demanded a new comprehensive plan.

6. Senator Robert Y. Patel’s “We’ll Fix It” Promise on Infrastructure

Sen. Patel, a key figure on the Senate Transportation Committee, promised that the forthcoming infrastructure bill would “fix the broken roads in less than six months.” The article notes that the bill, as drafted, had no timeline for implementation and would instead fund the procurement of new equipment. The piece links to the actual bill text from Congress.gov, pointing out that the language “fix the broken roads” was later amended to “improve the overall quality of highways.”

7. Representative Emily K. Lee’s “Black Lives Matter” Denial

Rep. Lee posted a social media thread denying that the Black Lives Matter movement had any legitimate grievances, claiming instead that “the movement is a distraction.” The article cites a 2024 court ruling that found a pattern of civil‑rights violations in the city’s police department and links to a statement from the NAACP, underscoring the political fallout from her remarks.

8. Congressman Jason S. Morales’s “I Support the Right to Discriminate”

In a press release, Congressman Morales stated, “I support the right to discriminate based on protected classes.” The piece calls this statement “a blatant violation of the Civil Rights Act” and links to a legal analysis from the American Civil Liberties Union that explained the statute’s prohibition on such discrimination.

9. Minister of Agriculture’s “We’ve Got Everything Covered” Regarding the Crop Shortage

A statement from the Minister of Agriculture claimed that the nation’s food supply was secure, while a concurrent USDA report indicated a 30% decline in key crop yields due to a drought. The article links to the USDA report, which provided a detailed analysis of the projected food insecurity.

10. The “Political Turkey” of the Year: President‑elect’s Use of “Pardons”

In a speech on the “Pardons” policy, the President‑elect claimed that “pardons” are “a tool for moving forward.” The article argues that the claim was misleading because it suggested that a pardon could absolve political wrongdoing, while a separate article from the Department of Justice clarified that pardons are limited to criminal offenses.

Public Reaction and the Take‑Home Message

The article notes a common theme across all blunders: a failure to listen to data, a tendency to oversimplify complex issues, and a lack of accountability. Each misstep was amplified by the relentless pace of social media, and the public’s tolerance for political missteps appears to have reached a new low. Readers can find additional context in the article’s many embedded links, including reputable fact‑checkers, legislative documents, and academic studies. The author closes with a warning that 2025 may have already set a precedent for what it means to be a “political turkey,” and that the only way to salvage credibility is to act with transparency, humility, and a willingness to correct mistakes.