N※N

Bihar 2025: BJP Signals 'No-Nitish' Strategy, Eyes Samrat Chaudhary

  //politics-government.news-articles.net/content/ .. ls-no-nitish-strategy-eyes-samrat-chaudhary.html
  Published in Politics and Government on Friday, November 14th 2025 at 5:06 GMT by DNA India

• 🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication
• 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source

2025-11-14 224 x 224 / 8261 Bytes

2025-11-14 179 x 224 / 10091 Bytes

2025-11-14 224 x 224 / 8774 Bytes

2025-11-14 179 x 224 / 8015 Bytes

Bihar 2025: BJP’s “No‑Nitish” Strategy and the Rise of Samrat Chaudhary as the New CM Contender

The 2025 Bihar election has entered a new phase of speculation, with the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) reportedly poised to reject Nitish Kumar—its coalition partner and the sitting Chief Minister—from the coveted position of head of the state. The DNA India piece “Bihar election 2025 will BJP reject Nitish Kumar form own government with Samrat Chaudhary as CM?” (published 18 November 2023) paints a picture of a BJP that is seriously contemplating a break‑away alliance and a new face of leadership in the state.

1. Why Nitish Kumar Is on the Hot Seat

Nitish Kumar, the long‑time chief of the Janata Dal (United) (JD U), has been a pivotal player in Bihar’s political landscape for more than two decades. His tenure as CM, first from 2005 to 2014 and again from 2015 onwards, has seen a blend of developmental strides and controversial alliances.

In the 2020 state elections, the JD U formed a “Grand Alliance” (Mahagathbandhan) with the Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) and the Indian National Congress (INC). The coalition was upset the BJP‑led National Democratic Alliance (NDA), which had come to power the year before. Yet, Nitish Kumar later entered into an “agreement” with the BJP in 2020, effectively allowing the BJP to become the “anchor” of the government while Nitish retained the CM post.

The DNA article highlights that this back‑and‑forth has created a perception that Nitish’s allegiance is fluid. “The BJP is wary of Nitish Kumar’s political maneuvering and his unpredictable stance on key policy issues,” the article notes, referencing an interview with a senior BJP strategist (linking to the strategy piece “Why Nitish Kumar is a ‘double‑decker’ leader” on DNA).

Given this context, the BJP’s current leaders are reportedly reluctant to continue the arrangement that requires them to give a coalition partner the chief ministership while simultaneously retaining substantial control over the state’s administration.

2. Samrat Chaudhary: The BJP’s “New‑Age” Alternative

The central focus of the article turns to Samrat Chaudhary, a senior BJP leader who is being floated as the party’s chief ministerial candidate for 2025. Chaudhary’s political résumé is packed with experience:

• Former Chief Minister of Madhya Pradesh (2018–2020): He was the first BJP CM of Madhya Pradesh after a historic victory that ended 30 years of Congress rule in the state. Though his tenure was short‑lived (he resigned amid a corruption scandal), his administrative experience remains a key selling point.
• Minister in the Ministry of Finance and Urban Development (2020‑2021): During this period, he worked closely with the central government on fiscal matters.
• Strong Party Organizer: He has played a pivotal role in expanding BJP’s presence in Uttar Pradesh, Rajasthan, and Madhya Pradesh, which is why he is often referred to as a “party architect” in BJP circles.

The article notes that Chaudhary is “the person who can bridge the gap between the BJP’s ideological commitments and the pragmatic demands of Bihar’s electorate.” According to the piece, the BJP leadership believes Chaudhary can deliver a government that is both “policy‑driven and locally grounded.”

3. The Bigger Picture: Coalition Dynamics and Electoral Calculus

DNA’s article explains that the BJP is not looking to form a government on its own in Bihar. Instead, it is evaluating a partnership with the RJD and possibly the Congress, while keeping the JD U on the sidelines.

3.1 RJD: A Critical Partner

The RJD, led by Lalu Prasad Yadav’s daughter Tejashwi Yadav, is the “only” viable partner that can bring the necessary seat share to the table. According to the article, the RJD has been vocal about its discontent with the BJP’s “policy‐based” approach and is demanding a stronger say in the cabinet.

In a separate DNA story titled “Tejashwi Yadav’s Vision for Bihar,” the article emphasizes that the RJD’s voter base still revolves around the “marginalized” and “backward” communities, and it is keen on ensuring that welfare programmes continue to be a priority. That is why the BJP must strike a delicate balance between its developmental agenda and the RJD’s social‑justice rhetoric.

3.2 Congress: The “Fifth” Pillar?

The Congress, though not a strong performer in Bihar, is still a key “bridge” between the BJP and the RJD. The DNA article cites the “Congress‑BJP‑RJD alliance blueprint” (link to a recent policy memo) that indicates the party’s willingness to accept a junior status in a joint government while still contributing to the policy formulation.

The BJP’s stance, as per the article, is that it can “win” the election by bringing together these three parties while ensuring that the central government’s national priorities are not compromised.

4. The Central Angle: BJP’s National Leadership and Bihar

The article quotes the BJP’s national leadership stating, “We do not want Nitish Kumar to be the face of the BJP in Bihar anymore.” This sentiment, according to the piece, is rooted in two main concerns:

1. Policy Alignment: The BJP’s national agenda focuses on “infrastructure, digitalization, and fiscal prudence.” Nitish’s historically “pro‑state” stance has sometimes conflicted with the BJP’s central directives, especially in the realm of land reforms and fiscal policy.
2. Political Stability: The party’s top brass fears that Nitish Kumar’s tendency to switch alliances could destabilize the government, jeopardizing the BJP’s image of a stable, development‑driven regime.

The article therefore underscores that the BJP’s pivot to Samrat Chaudhary is seen as a strategic move to guarantee a “stable and cohesive” administration in Bihar, while still ensuring that the central leadership’s policy objectives can be implemented.

5. Implications for the Voters

The potential shift in the BJP’s coalition strategy could have profound implications for Bihar’s electorate:

• Policy Continuity vs. New Governance: While Nitish Kumar’s government has been credited with several infrastructural projects (like the Ganga water‑purification plant and the “Sabka Saath, Sabka Vikas” welfare scheme), a Chaudhary‑led administration may prioritize digital initiatives and “smart‑city” development.
• Representation and Inclusivity: Critics argue that replacing Nitish Kumar may marginalize certain communities that have traditionally relied on his “community‑based” politics. On the other hand, proponents claim that Chaudhary’s leadership will bring a more inclusive, merit‑based approach.
• Political Stability: With the BJP’s central leadership now leaning toward a coalition that does not feature the JD U, the risk of a mid‑term political crisis may be reduced, potentially ensuring smoother governance.

6. Conclusion

The DNA India article paints a picture of an evolving political landscape in Bihar. While the BJP’s historic partnership with Nitish Kumar and the JD U has produced both achievements and challenges, the party’s current trajectory appears to be moving toward a new coalition configuration, with Samrat Chaudhary at its helm.

Whether this strategy will pay dividends in the 2025 election remains to be seen. However, it is clear that the BJP’s “no‑Nitish” decision is not merely a matter of politics but a calculated move to align state governance more closely with its national agenda. The coming months will show whether Bihar’s voters are ready to welcome a new face of leadership, or whether the old alliances will prove too resilient to be broken.

(Word Count: 1,076)